Volltextsuche nutzen
- versandkostenfrei ab € 30,–
- 11x in Wien, NÖ und Salzburg
- 6 Mio. Bücher
- facultas
- Detailansicht
Selective Security
War and the United Nations Security Council since 1945
E-Book
(PDF mit drm)
(PDF mit drm)
33,76€
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
EPDF (mit DRM) sofort downloaden
Downloads sind nur in Österreich möglich!
Leitfaden zu E-Books
Downloads sind nur in Österreich möglich!
Leitfaden zu E-Books
In den Warenkorb
Click & Collect
Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Derzeit in keiner facultas Filiale lagernd. Jetzt online bestellen!Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Artikel in den Warenkorb legen, zur Kassa gehen und Wunschfiliale auswählen. Lieferung abholen und bequem vor Ort bezahlen.
Auf die Merkliste
Veröffentlicht 2013, von Adam (Royal Holloway, University of London, UK) Roberts, Dominik Zaum bei Taylor and Francis
ISBN: 978-1-135-87148-2
Reihe: Adelphi series
94 Seiten
...
Kurztext / Annotation
In contrast to the common perception that the United Nations is, or should become, a system of collective security, this paper advances the proposition that the UN Security Council embodies a necessarily selective approach. Analysis of its record since 1945 suggests that the Council cannot address all security threats effectively. The reasons for this include not only the veto power of the five permanent members, but also the selectivity of all UN member states: their unwillingness to provide forces for peacekeeping or other purposes except on a case-by-case basis, and their reluctance to involve the Council in certain conflicts to which they are parties, or which they perceive as distant, complex and resistant to outside involvement. The Council's selectivity is generally seen as a problem, even a threat to its legitimacy. Yet selectivity, which is rooted in prudence and in the UN Charter itself, has some virtues. Acknowledging the necessary limitations within which the Security Council operates, this paper evaluates the Council's achievements in tackling the problem of war since 1945. In doing so, it sheds light on the division of labour among the Council, regional security bodies and states, and offers a pioneering contribution to public and governmental understanding of the UN's past, present and future roles.
Beschreibung für Leser
Unterstützte Lesegerätegruppen: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
In contrast to the common perception that the United Nations is, or should become, a system of collective security, this paper advances the proposition that the UN Security Council embodies a necessarily selective approach. Analysis of its record since 1945 suggests that the Council cannot address all security threats effectively. The reasons for this include not only the veto power of the five permanent members, but also the selectivity of all UN member states: their unwillingness to provide forces for peacekeeping or other purposes except on a case-by-case basis, and their reluctance to involve the Council in certain conflicts to which they are parties, or which they perceive as distant, complex and resistant to outside involvement. The Council's selectivity is generally seen as a problem, even a threat to its legitimacy. Yet selectivity, which is rooted in prudence and in the UN Charter itself, has some virtues. Acknowledging the necessary limitations within which the Security Council operates, this paper evaluates the Council's achievements in tackling the problem of war since 1945. In doing so, it sheds light on the division of labour among the Council, regional security bodies and states, and offers a pioneering contribution to public and governmental understanding of the UN's past, present and future roles.
Beschreibung für Leser
Unterstützte Lesegerätegruppen: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet