Volltextsuche nutzen
- versandkostenfrei ab € 30,–
- 11x in Wien, NÖ und Salzburg
- 6 Mio. Bücher
- facultas
- Detailansicht
Q in Context I
The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source / Die Scheidung zwischen Gerechten und Ungerechten in Frühjudentum und Logienquelle
Hardcover
67,00€
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Herstellung bei AnforderungVersandkostenfreibestellen in Österreich
Deutschland: € 10,00
EU & Schweiz: € 20,00
EU & Schweiz: € 20,00
In den Warenkorb
Click & Collect
Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Derzeit in keiner facultas Filiale lagernd. Jetzt online bestellen!Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Artikel in den Warenkorb legen, zur Kassa gehen und Wunschfiliale auswählen. Lieferung abholen und bequem vor Ort bezahlen.
Auf die Merkliste
Veröffentlicht 2015, von Markus Tiwald bei V&R unipress
ISBN: 978-3-8471-0322-6
Auflage: 1. Auflage
Reihe: Bonner Biblische Beiträge
275 Seiten
23.7 cm x 16 cm
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of ...
Beschreibung
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel. Thus, polemics in Q could also be interpreted as an inner-Jewish struggle for the true apocalyptic interpretation of the Torah rather than as an already completed “Parting of the Ways”.
Werbliche Überschrift
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel.
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel. Thus, polemics in Q could also be interpreted as an inner-Jewish struggle for the true apocalyptic interpretation of the Torah rather than as an already completed “Parting of the Ways”.
Werbliche Überschrift
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel.