Volltextsuche nutzen
- versandkostenfrei ab € 30,–
- 11x in Wien, NÖ und Salzburg
- 6 Mio. Bücher
- facultas
- Detailansicht
Das Natürlichkeitsargument bei biotechnologischen Maßnahmen.
Taschenbuch
92,50€
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Besorgungstitel
Lieferzeit 1-2 WochenVersandkostenfreibestellen in Österreich
Lieferzeit 1-2 WochenVersandkostenfreibestellen in Österreich
Deutschland: € 10,00
EU & Schweiz: € 20,00
EU & Schweiz: € 20,00
In den Warenkorb
Click & Collect
Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Derzeit in keiner facultas Filiale lagernd. Jetzt online bestellen!Artikel online bestellen und in der Filiale abholen.
Artikel in den Warenkorb legen, zur Kassa gehen und Wunschfiliale auswählen. Lieferung abholen und bequem vor Ort bezahlen.
Auf die Merkliste
Veröffentlicht 2019, von Frauke Rostalski bei Duncker & Humblot
ISBN: 978-3-428-15462-3
Auflage: 1. Auflage
Reihe: Schriften zur Rechtstheorie
219 Seiten
23.3 cm x 15.7 cm
This paper examines the validity of naturalistic arguments in the discussion on the legitimacy of biotechnological measures. This objective is approached through critical evaluation of the concept of naturalness used in that context. In general, the concept is based on the Aristotelian separation of art and nature and thus meets first criticism. This is followed by an in-depth examination of the ...
Beschreibung
This paper examines the validity of naturalistic arguments in the discussion on the legitimacy of biotechnological measures. This objective is approached through critical evaluation of the concept of naturalness used in that context. In general, the concept is based on the Aristotelian separation of art and nature and thus meets first criticism. This is followed by an in-depth examination of the validity of naturalistic arguments being used as legitimation for legal standards of conduct in the field of biomedicine. Ultimately, only the arguments providing the better reasons for a specific position are able to convince in legal discussions. Naturalistic arguments prove to be obstructive in the debate on new biotechnological procedures.
This paper examines the validity of naturalistic arguments in the discussion on the legitimacy of biotechnological measures. This objective is approached through critical evaluation of the concept of naturalness used in that context. In general, the concept is based on the Aristotelian separation of art and nature and thus meets first criticism. This is followed by an in-depth examination of the validity of naturalistic arguments being used as legitimation for legal standards of conduct in the field of biomedicine. Ultimately, only the arguments providing the better reasons for a specific position are able to convince in legal discussions. Naturalistic arguments prove to be obstructive in the debate on new biotechnological procedures.